Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010237862023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3661/2023 EAJUL HOQUE S/O LATE ALIMUDDIN AHMED, R/O MILLIJULI PATH, SATGAON NOPARA, P.S.- SATGAON, P.O.- UDAYAN BIHAR, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS 1.BADRUL ISLAM AND 10 ORS. S/O MAKRAM ALI, R/O FLAT NO. B2 AND C 2ND FLOOR BLOCK- 3A REGENT PARADISE, GHORAMARA, P.O.- GHORAMARA, P.S.- HATIGAON, DIST.- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM, GUWAHATI- 781038. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 6. 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(METRO) GUWAHATI. 4:GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 5:GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 32. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 6:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT GUWAHATI. 7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE EAST POLICE DISTRICT GUWAHATI. Page No.# 2/3 8:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CENTRAL POLICE DISTRICT GUWAHATI. 9:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE BASISTHA GUWAHATI. 10:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI. 11:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE SATGAON POLICE STATION SATGAON For the Applicant(s) : Mr. S. Saikia, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D.P. Borah, Advocate for respondent No.1. : Mr. N. Das, Government Advocate, Assam for respondent Nos.2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10. : Mr. S. Bora, Standing Counsel, GMC and Standing Counsel, GMDA for respondent Nos.3 & 4. – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM 05.02.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) Mr. S. Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the applicant has submitted that in pursuant to the order dated 09.12.2024 passed by this Court, the amended cause-title of the Interlocutory Application has been filed. Office to verify and tag the same along with the Interlocutory Application. The matter comes upon for consideration of this Interlocutory Application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with a prayer to condone the delay of 122 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal. No affidavit-in-opposition has been filed on behalf of the respondents. Page No.# 3/3 Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and after going through the contents of the Interlocutory Application, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 122 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal. Hence, the Interlocutory Application is allowed and the delay of 122 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same for admission after 4(four) weeks. The instant Interlocutory Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant