Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20665 (AP)

PERUMALLA KANAKAVALLI TAYARAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15060/2025 · 2025-06-23

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI APHC010291012025 / o (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No: 15060 OF 2025 Between: Perumalla Kanakavalli Tayaramma, Female, aged: 93 years, Senior Citizen, W/o. Late Venkata Subba Rao, R/o.Alluru (V), Mudinepalli (M), Eluru District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, (Home Department), A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru. Eluru District. 3. Sub-Divisional Police Officer, N.R.Pet, Eluru, Eluru District. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Mudenipalli Mandal, Kaikaluru, Eluru District. 5. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mudinepalli (V) & (Mandal), Eluru District. 6. Kuriseti Ravi Kishore, S/o. K. Nagabhushanam, Commission Agent, C/o.Maruti Rama Rice Mill, Alluru (V), Mudinepalli (M), Eluru District. ...RESPONDENTS: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction or order or orders more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the petitioner’s representation / dated: 19-5-2025 and to provide Police agricultural land of an extent of Ac.4.80 cents in R.S.No.411/B and another extent of Ac. 1.50 cents in protection to the petitioner’s R.S/No.41 situated in Bomminampadu (V), Mudinepalli (M), Eluru District for cultivating agricultural lands as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and clear violation of Principles of Natural Justice and clear violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to provide Police protection of Petitioner’s agricultural land of an extent of Ac.4.80 cents in R.S.No.411/B and another extent of Ac.1.50 cents in R.S.No.41 situated in Bomminampadu (V), Mudinepalli (M), Eluru District for cultivating the agricultural lands. lA No: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to provide police protection to the agricultural cultural lands an extent of Ac.4.30 cents in R.S.NO.411/B and another extent of Ac. 1.50 cents in R.S.No.41 situated in Bomminampadu (V), Mudinepalli (M), Eluru District by considering the Petitioner's Representation dated 19-5-2025 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.P.RAJU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: The Court made the following: ORDER Petitioner’s « APHC010291012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15060/2025 Between: Perumalla Kanakavalli Tayaramma ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.B PRAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 0' ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aged about 93 years and he is eking out her livelihood from the agricultural land situated in Bomminampadu village, Mudinepalli Mandal, Eluru district. 2. It is submitted that respondent No.6 is interfering with the cultivation of the said property. It is further submitted that respondent No.6 is the grandson of the petitioner. 3. It is stated that that earlier, respondent No.6 has filed W.P.No.12277 of 2025, alleging that the police were interfering in civil disputes. In that case, this Court directed the police competent not to interfere in the disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6 without following due process of law. It is also submitted that respondent No.6 is actually interfering with the possession of the petitioner, over which the petitioner has right, title and possession. However, the police are not taking into consideration the petitioner’s representation dated 19.05.2025, as per the earlier directions of this Court not to interfere in civil disputes. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 5. Considering the age of the petitioner, respondent No.5 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023. m \ 3 6. With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTAN^EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, (Home Department), State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, Eluru District. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, N.R.Pet, Eluru. Eluru District. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Mudenipalli Mandal, Kaikaluru, Eluru District. 5. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mudinepalli (V) (Mandal), Eluru District. 6. Kuriseti Ravi Kishore, S/o. K. Nagabhushanam, Commission Agent, C/o.Maruti Rama Rice Mill, Alluru (V), Mudinepalli (M), Eluru Distric 7. One CC to Sri B.P.Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 9. Three CD Copies. gi m 1 HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.15060 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS