( 2025:HHC:1652 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9630 of 2024 Decided on: 8th January, 2025 State Bank of India .......petitioner versus State of H.P and others ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G with Mr. Raj Negi, Dy. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwani K. Lal and Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.4. Respondent No.5 ex-parte. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) It is not in dispute that it is petitioner who has first charge over the property in question, as would be further evident from instructions dated 09.10.2024 (pages 183-184 of the paper book) and as has been acknowledged by respondent No.4. Therefore, any other charge created, more particularly, in favour of respondent No.4 shall be subservient and subject to the claim of the petitioner. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. ( 2025:HHC:1652 ) 2 2. With this clarification, the instant petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge January 08, 2025 ( Rakesh Kainthla ) (naveen) Judge