- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9735 WP No. 9159 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 9159 OF 2024 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA S/O LATE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, R/AT BANDAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TLAUK, BENGALURU - 562 106. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.SRINIVASAIAH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDI ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, K G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 562 106. 4. THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS ANEKAL, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DIST - 562 106. 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9735 WP No. 9159 of 2024 SURYA CITY P S, CHANDRAPURA, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DIST - 562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA., AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-3 TO PLACE THE APPLICATION VIDE ANNX-A OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION OF SY.NO.251 TO THE EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 10 GUNTAS SITUATED AT MADIWALA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a direction to respondent No.3 to place his application before the committee for regularization of unauthorized occupation. 2. The petitioner appears to have made a claim in respect of his alleged unauthorized occupation in respect of Sy.No.251, measuring 1 acre 10 guntas situated at Madiwala Village, Kasaba Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District way back in the year 1991. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9735 WP No. 9159 of 2024 It is his case that his application has remained unconsidered. 3. In that view of the matter, it would be appropriate to direct the Tahsildar - respondent No.3 to take necessary action and ensure that the application filed by the petitioner is considered in a manner known to law. 4. The said exercise shall be undertaken and completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. This petition is accordingly disposed of. 6. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1