Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010237512024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5940/2024 SUNIL DAS AND ANR SON OF LATE SONA RAM DAS, A RESIDENT OF NO. 1 SAIKIA CHUBURI, P.O./P.S.- ORANG, CIRCLE OFFICE- MAZBAT, IN THE DISTRICT OF UDALGURI, BTC, ASSAM- 784507, INDIA 2: SRI BHUPEN SAIKIA SON OF BHOLARAM SAIKIA A RESIDENT OF HATIBIL P.O./P.S.- MAZBAT IN THE DISTRICT OF UDALGURI BTC ASSAM- 784507 INDI VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL (BTC) KOKRAJHAR REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY P.O.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTC) ASSAM PIN- 783370 3:THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) BTC KOKRAJHAR P.O.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTC) Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN- 783370 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER UDALGURI BTC ASSAM 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER MAZBAT REVENUE CIRCLE UDALGURI BTC ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P BOIRAGI, MR. S J SARMAH,MRS. B TALUKDAR,A TALUKDAR,MR G G GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM,SC, BTC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR ORDER Date : 29.01.2025 Heard Mr. G. G. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R. K. Mochahary, learned standing counsel, BTC has furnished a Communication dated 16.01.2025, written by the Joint Secretary, BTC, Kokrajhar, wherein, it is stated that the NOC which was processed by the BTC has been rejected. The learned standing counsel, BTC has also produced another Communication dated 30.12.2024, wherein, it is stated that BTC has rejected the proposal for NOC for sale purchase of land submitted from the Mazbat Revenue Circle. Mr. G. G. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the Communications dated 16.01.2025 and 30.12.2024, the matter has become Page No.# 3/3 infructuous. However he seeks liberty to challenge the said Communications, if so advised. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous, however, giving liberty to the petitioners to challenge the Communications dated 16.01.2024 and 30.12.2024, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant