TVL.SREE SAI MEENAKSHI ALLOYS v. The Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST Appeals)
/45399/2025 · 2025-12-01
C Saravanan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 206529 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 206529 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.45399 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.12.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.
4 5399
of 2025 and
W.M.P.No
s . 50583 and 50584 of 2025
Tvl.Sree Sai Meenakshi Alloys Represented by its Partner S.Sabari Karthikeyan, SF No.32/2, SHED No.1 Arisipalayam Road, Othakalmandapam, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 032. ... Petitioner
Vs. 1.The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST Appeals), Commercial Taxes Building, Coimbatore.
2. The State Tax Officer (ST), Kuniyamuthur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1 st respondent vide the impugned Appeal Rejection Order in Form GST APL- 02 bearing reference No.ZD330825044460K dated 05.08.2025 and quash the ____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.45399 of 2025 same as is in violation of principles of Natural Justice, and to direct the 2 nd respondent to release the payments due to the petitioner pursuant to the issuance of Form GST DRC-13 dated 14.10.2025 and to further direct the 2 nd respondent to unblock the Input Tax Credit in the petitioner’s electronic credit ledger. For Petitioner : M/s.Prageetha, J. For Respondents : M/s.P.Selvi, Government Advocate
********* O R D E R The petitioner is before this Court challenging the impugned order dated 05.08.2025, whereby the appeal filed on 04.08.2025 against the
Order-in-Original dated 17.04.2025 has been rejected.
2. It is noted that, at the time of filing the aforesaid appeal on 04.08.2025, the petitioner had already deposited 10% of the disputed tax. ____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.45399 of 2025
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that another 10% was directed to be paid after the impugned order was passed, and the same has been paid on 25.11.2025. A copy of the challan has been enclosed.
4. Recording the above and considering the fact that the delay falls within the condonable period of limitation, the impugned order is quashed, and the matter is remitted to the first respondent to be disposed of on merits without further reference to the issue of limitation.
5. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected W.M.Ps are closed.tit i o is disposed of with rectionNo costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P is clos 01.12.2025 nvi Neutral Citation : Yes / No To: 1.The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST Appeals), ____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.45399 of 2025 Commercial Taxes Building, Coimbatore.
2. The State Tax Officer (ST), Kuniyamuthur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore.
C.SARAVANAN, J., nvi ____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.45399 of 2025 W.P.No.
4 5399
of 2025 and
W.M.P.No
s .50583 and 50584 of 2025
01.12.2025 ____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis