Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20651 (GAU)

EX GO 2518M M L AGRAWAL v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/518/2025 · 2025-02-04

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010237892024 2025:GAU-AS:1174 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/518/2025 EX GO 2518M M L AGRAWAL S/O- SHRI KASTUR CHAND AGRAWAL, PERMANENT R/O- GANDHI SAGAR, DIST.- MANDSAUR, MADHYA PRADESH- 458771, INDIA VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI- 110001 2:THE DEFENCE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI- 110001 3:THE JOINT SECRETARY (BR-WING) MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (EARLIER DESIGNATED AS SECRETARY (BRDB)) ROOM NO. 418 B WING 4TH FLOOR SENA BHAWAN NEW DELHI- 110011 4:DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER ROADS ORGANIZATION SEEMA SADAK BHAWAN RING ROAD DELHI CANTT. NEW DELHI- 11001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R BORAH, MR. D BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. S S ROY (C.G.C) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 05.02.2025 1. Heard Mr. D. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.S.Roy, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 2. Mr. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that considering the bone of contention that earlier judgment dated 08.03.2022 in WP(C) No. 3226/2014 was passed based on wrong and misleading fact pleaded by the respondent authority, it would be appropriate to file a review petition seeking review of the aforesaid judgment. 3. Accordingly, Mr. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file a review petition. 4. Prayer stands allowed. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed with a liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant