Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20650 (JHR)

BRAHMDEV YADAV ALIAS BRAHAMDEV YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6898/2025 · 2025-08-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23040 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6898 of 2025 --------- Brahmdev Yadav @ Brahamdev Yadav, aged about 27 years, son of Kati Yadav, resident of village-Purhara, P.O.-Machhali, P.S.-Bhelwaghati, District-Giridih, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-08.08.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 in connection with Bhelwaghati P.S. Case No.24/2024. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to mere suspicion and there is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. He further submits that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather the allegation is general and omnibus in nature. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and also the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. He further submits that the main accused person of the present case namely, Rinku Devi has already been granted bail on 22.11.2024 in B.A. No.9375/2024. He lastly submits that the petitioner is a farmer by occupation and he is having no criminal antecedent and petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 17.05.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 2025:JHHC:23040 2 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner which is general and omnibus in nature coupled with the fact that the main accused has already been granted regular bail; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Bhelwaghati P.S. Case No.24/2024. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-