Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010236142023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6210/2023 MOTOZEN FUEL SYSTEMS PVT LTD AND ANR HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT- PLOT NO. B-92, BLOCK-B, BADLI INDUSTRIAL AREA, NORTH DELHI, PIN- 110042, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY- SRI SURAJIT SINHA. 2: SURAJIT SINHA SON OF JOGESH SINHA RESIDENT OF VIP ROAD 101 SIXMILE GUWAHATI- 781022 DISTRICT- KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, PARLIAMENT STREET, PIN- 110001, NEW DELHI. 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT PARIBAHAN BHAWAN JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPARA GUWAHATI- 781022. Page No.# 2/3 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT BLOCK-D 3RD FLOOR JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 4:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT BLOCK- D 3RD FLOOR JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 5:ALL ASSAM DISTRIBUTORS OF ROAD SAFETY EQUIPMENTS SOCIETY A REGISTERED SOCIETY UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT WITH ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NARAYAN KUTIR 29 MC ROAD CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI- 781003 ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SHRI SUJAL BORDOLOI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T K MISRA, MR. A. GAYAN,MR. P K MUNIR,DIPTI CHAKRAVARTY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MRS. A GAYAN,MR B PRASAD (r-5),MR P J BORAH (r-5),MR D K MISHRA (r-5),SC, TRANSPORT BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 30.01.2025 Heard Mr. P. K. Munir, Learned Counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. A. Gayan, CGC for the Respondent No.1 and Ms. M. D. Bora, Learned Standing Page No.# 3/3 Counsel Transport Department for the Respondents No: 2, 3 & 4. Mr. D. K. Mishra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. B. Prasad, learned Counsel, appears for the Respondent No: 5. Mr. P. K. Munir, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that he has received instructions from the petitioner to not press the matter any further. Accordingly, he prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. Prayer is not objected to by the learned Counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant