Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20649 (AP)

Shri Bhogireddi Sasibushan v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/13410/2019 · 2025-09-18

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010290632019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13410/2019 Between: 1. SHRI BHOGIREDDI SASIBUSHAN, S/O,VEERABHADRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YRS, D.NO.3215-106/1,DASARI LINGAYYA, MADHU GARDENS, MOGHALARAJPURAM,VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, STATE OF AP. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SHAKTI BHAVAN, SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CENTRAL DIVISON, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. VATTIPROLUDEVADANA PRAKASH, S/O SYAMSUNDAR, R/O D.NO.43-107/1-13, CASTE. 'SC', ANDHRA PRADESH COLONY, 4TH LINE, KANAKADURGANAGAR, AJITASINGHNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. VATTIPROLU BABU RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O VENKATARATNAM, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, BUILDER 42- 3/2-18, FLAT NO.103, BLOCK NO. 1, SATYANARAYANA TOWERS, RAMAKRISHNAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 7. GARIMELLA VITAL PRASAD, S/O SITA RAMA RAO, R/O FLAT NO.204, B-BLOCK, ANJENEYA TOWNSHIP, EDUPUGALLY P.C. -521151. 8. KAMINENI RAMESH, S/O RAMACHANDRA RAO, FLAT NO.304, B-BLOK, ROYAL RESIDENCY, NEAR SURAKSHA HOSPITAL, CHANDRA RAJESWARA RAO ROAD, MOGHALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA – 520010. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M V RAJA RAAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13410 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ or order or directions particularly in the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents particularly the 4th Respondent in not registering the complaint dated 15.05.2019 by taking action against the Private Respondents as illegal, arbitrary, violative of article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and Ultra Vires, in the interest of justice and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri M.V.Raja Raam, learned counsel for the writ petitioner is in attendance. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that basing on the report received from the petitioner, police registered a case in Crime No.313 of 2019 of Machavaram Police Station, for the offence under Sections 448, 427, 506, 509 r/w 34 of IPC and investigated into the case. 4. Upon hearing Sri M.V.Raja Raam, learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of, giving liberty to police to investigate into the case, as they already registered the case, as referred above. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 19.09.2025 Pmk 5 21 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:13410 OF 2019 Date: 19.09.2025 Pmk