AMATYA BARUKIAL and ANR. v. OIL INDIA LTD and 6 ORS.
WP(C)/3324/2017 · 2025-10-21
Soumitra Saikia
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20647 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20647 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010236832017
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3324/2017 AMATYA BARUKIAL and ANR.
S/O. LT. HARI PRASAD BARUKIAL, R/O. C/O. M NAZIR, ZEET NURSERY, NEAR TRISHUL PRESS, KAMALABARI ROAD, DULIAJAN, DIST.
DIBRUGARH, ASSAM.
2: JITUL HAZARIKA S/O. SRI MANIK HAZARIKA R/O. NAOHOLIA DULIAJAN P.O. and P.S. DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM VERSUS OIL INDIA LTD and 6 ORS.
DULIAJAN, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, OIL INDIA LTD., DULIAJAN, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN-786602.
2:THE GENERAL MANAGER OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786602.
3:THE DY. GENERAL MANAGER EMPLOYEE RELATION OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 PIN-786602.
4:THE DY. GENERAL MANAGER TRANSPORT DEPTT.
OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786602.
5:THE SENIOR MANAGER EMPLOYEE RELATION OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786602.
6:SHIVRAJ THAPA C/O. OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786602.
7:JYOTIPRASAD KONWAR C/O. OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786602 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.T BARUKIAL, MR.K K HANDIQUE Advocate for the Respondent : MR.K KALITA R- 1-5, MR.A JAHID(R- 1-5),MR.S CHOUDHURY(R- 1-5),MR.S N SARMA(SC, OIL.)(Sr.Adv.)(R- 1 to 5)
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 22.10.2025 None appears for the petitioners on call. Mr. A. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel appears for the OIL respondents. Office Note reflects that fresh steps on respondent Nos. 6 and 7 directed to be taken has not been received inspite of the orders passed by the Lawazima Court. It appears that the writ petitioners do not wish to pursue the writ petition any further. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant