Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20644 (JHR)

CHAND PINGUA ALIAS CHAND MANI KUNKAL v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4543/2025 · 2025-08-21

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:24583 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4543 of 2025 Chand Pingua @ Chand Mani Kankal, aged about 57 years, wife of Late Dennis Kankal, resident of House No.275, Musi, Near G.E.L. Church, New Sitaramdera, P.O. & P.S. Sitaramdera Agrico, Dist.- East Singhbhum … Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dashrath Ambuj, son of Late Hari Sharma, resident of Panchwati Puram, P.O. RMCH, P.S. Sadar, Dist.- Ranchi … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ----- 04/21.08.2025 The matter relates to Complaint Case No.321/2017, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner earlier moved before this Court in A.B.A. No.7531 of 2022 and the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 29.02.2024. He submits that now the charge-sheet has been submitted. 3. The Court finds that there is no new ground to entertain this second anticipatory bail application. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to move before the learned Court in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the State has got no objection. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/