[2025:RJ-JP:30453] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8659/2025 Mirza Iktedar Baig S/o Shri Mirza Iftekhar Baig, R/o Victoria Empire, Kharbuja Mandi, M.d. Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Surajnarayan Sharma S/o Nanagram, (Deceased) 1/1 Ravindra Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o House No. 1143, Chanakya Marg, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. 1/2 Smt. Lata Devi W/o Late Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Daughter-In-Law Of Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o House No. 1143, Chanakya Marg, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. 1/3 Jai Kumar S/o Late Anil Kumar Sharma Grandson Of Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o House No. 1143, Chanakya Marg, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. 1/4 Rahul S/o Late Shri Anil Kumar Sharma Grandson Of Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o House No. 1143, Chanakya Marg, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. 1/5 Girdhar S/o Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o House No. 1143, Chanakya Marg, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. 1/6 Ashok S/o Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o House No. 1143, Chanakya Marg, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. 1/7 Harsh Kumar Jangid S/o Late Shri Jugal Kishore Grandson Of Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o House No. 1143, Chanakya Marg, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. 1/8 Smt. Bhawna Sharma W/o Shri Vijendra Sharma, D/o Late Shri Jugal Kishore Granddaughter Of Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o Plot No. 86, Gothwal Bhawan, Govind Nagar East, Amer Road, Jaipur. 1/9 Smt. Anita Devi W/o Hanuman Sahay D/o Late Shri Surajnarayan Sharma, R/o Kartik Marg, Jamuna Dairy, Sodala, Jaipur. All Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Sandeep Kumar Sharma, R/o House No. 1143, Chanakya Marg, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:30453] (2 of 2) [CW-8659/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Mamoon Khalid For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.K. Daga with Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/08/2025 1. After hearing the submissions made by learned counsels for the respective parties at some length, learned counsels for both the parties pray that the learned appellate Court, which is hearing the regular appeal, be directed to dispose the said appeal at the earliest. 2. Looked into the issue involved in the present writ petition, wherein the prayer is made only for interim relief till disposal of the appeal. 3. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsels for both the parties and the limited prayer made by them, this Court feels that it would be interest of justice to direct the Court below to hear the regular appeal and decide the same at the earliest & preferably within a period of two months. 4. Both the parties shall maintain the status quo which exists today with regard to possession of suit property till disposal of the appeal. 5. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of as above. 6. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /31