Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20638 (KAR)

MANJANNA A v. CAN FIN HOMES LTD

WP/9172/2025 · 2025-07-08

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24816 WP No. 9172 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 9172 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MANJANNA A, C/O AJJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2. SMT. PUSHPALATHA W/O MANJANNA A., AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, BOTH APPLICANTS ARE R/A NO. 11/35, 2ND CROSS, 7TH MAIN ROAD, KRISHNAPPA LAYOUT, KEREPALYA, HOSKEREHALLI, BSK 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 085. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRIKANTH N.V, ADVOCATE) AND: CAN FIN HOMES LTD., REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT 1956 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, HEAD OFFICE AT #29/1, III FLOOR, SIR M.N. KRISHNA RAO ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004. HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT NO. 69, (OLD NO. 35), 12TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 011. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V. LOKESH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24816 WP No. 9172 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 7.03.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK THEREBY DEMANDING A SUM OF RS. 19,58,086/- UNDER SECTION 13(4) OF THE SARFASI ACT 2002 AS PER ANNX-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo, which reads as follows: "The counsel appearing for the petitioners humbly submits that as per the instructions obtained by the petitioners are seeking leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above writ petition. Since the petitioners have settled the matter with the respondent bank and clear the balance amount which is payable to the respondent. Hence the same may kindly be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In light of the same, petition is dismissed as not calling for adjudication. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 135 CT: BHK