SALEM AHMED BARBHUIYA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
WP(C)/7417/2018 · 2025-01-05
Suman Shyam
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20637 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20637 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010236512018
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7417/2018 SALEM AHMED BARBHUIYA S/O ALAUDDIN BARBHUIYA VILL- UJANKUPA III, P.O. UJANKUPA P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN - 788151. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
TO BE REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GUWAHATI, ASSAM.
2:STATE MISSION DIRECTOR ASULMS ASULMS DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DISPUR GUWAHATI-06.
3:CITY PROJECT OFFICER CITY MISSION MANAGEMENT UNIT
ASSAM STATE URBAN LIVELIHOOD MISSION SOCIETY HAILAKANDI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A S TAPADAR, MR. D HUSSAIN,MS C M DEKA,MR. A M ALAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 06/01/2025
Mr. A.S. Tapadar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous and, therefore, the same be closed. Ms. U. Sharma, learned Government Advocate, Assam, is present on behalf of the State. On the submission of Mr. Tapadar, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE Sukhamay
Comparing Assistant