Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 206358 (MAD)

K.BALAJI RAO v. K.HANUMANTHA RAO

AS/171/2021 · 2025-11-24

A D Maria Clete

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE A.S.No.171 of 2021 1. K.Balaji Rao 2, K.Suvarna ... Appellants Vs. 1. K.Hanumantha Rao 2. K.Radhakrishnan 3. C.H.Jayalakshmi 4. Padmasree ... Respondents PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.03 of 2016 dated 07.01.2021 on the file of the learned the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur @ Poonamallee. For Appellants :Mr.K.Balu For R1 : Mr. G.Prakash 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis For R3 : Mr.r.Umashankar for Shri Shankar Associates For R2 & R4 : M/s.K.Muthamil Raja JUDGMENT Earlier, this Court, on 08.07.2025 had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras. Accordingly, the parties have appeared before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court Madras and arrived at a compromise. The parties have also filed a joint memo of compromise dated 19.11.2025, to that effect. 2. In view of above, this First Appeal is disposed of, in terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise dated 19.11.2025. The said Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part of the decree. Refund of Court fee is ordered under Section 69-A of 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Suit & Valuation Act, 1955. 24.11.2025 mfa Index: Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes / No To 1. The III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur @ Poonamallee. 2. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J mfa A.S.No.171 of 2021 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 24.11.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis