IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVASP* (Special Original Jurisdiction) twentieth day of JUNE fO TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE iir ;j -al i O present the honourable SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. WRIT PETITION NO: 14611 OF 909^; N Between: 1. Vattikuti Seethamahalakshm Singaramma Chinta East Godavari Dist. i, S/o.Chakram, Aged about centre, Mallavaram Village Gokavaram Mandal. 44 years 2. Vattikuti Durgaprasad, Singaramma Chinta East Godavari Dist. 3. Vattikuti Janardhana Singaramma Chinta I East Godavari Dist. 4. Alamuru Dhanalakshmi Singaramma Chinta East Godavari Dist. 5. Pasupuleti S/o.Chakram centre, Mallavaram Vil! Aged about 41 years, age, Gokavaram Mandai, Rao, S/o.Chakram Aged about 46 centre, Mallavaram Village Gokavaram years Mandal W/o.Krishna rao. Aged about 44 centre, Mallavaram Village, Gokavaram years Mandal Sri Venkata Surya M/o.Singaralakshmi, Aged about 22 Chakra Dhanush kumar, years, Singaramma Chinta centre, Mandal, East Godavari Dist. Mallavaram Village, Gokavaram ■ ■■PETITIONERS AND 1- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., By its. Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Building Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Superintendent of Police.. East Godavari District, Rajamahendravaram. 3. Station House Officer, Gokavaram police station East Godavari District. 4. Mundru Krishnarao @ Errababu S/o.Apparao, age 60 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 5. Thottipudi Nageswara Rao S/o.Nagaraju, age 55yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 6. Ramisetty Ganga S/o.Nookaraju, age 60yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 7. Ramisetty Sivakumar S/o.Ganga, age 32 yrs Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 8. Pydipala Suribabu, S/o.Thambayya, age SOyrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 9. Pydipala Sathibabu S/o.Thambayya, age 55yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 10. Athuluri srinu S/o.Thatharao, age 50 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 11. Athuluri Nagababu, S/o.Thatharao, age 55yrs Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 12. Chalapareddy Naag S/o.Ramana age 35yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 13. Kuppula Naagu, S/o.Singaram, age 40yrs, Mallisala village, .Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 14. Palepureddy Dorababu S/o.Giriyya age 40yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 15. Siyadula Simhachalam S/o.Nallabbai, age 50yrs Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 16. Chintha Bhadram S/o.Narayana, age 60 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 17. Aakumarthi khana S/o.Gubbalu, age 45yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 18. Palepureddy Satyanarayana S/o. Surya rao, age 60 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 19. Pallikonda Bhadram S/o.Kootayya, age 60 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 20. Pallikonda Suribabu S/o.Kootayya, age 55 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 21. Pallikonda Naagu S/o.Nookaraju, age 45yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal t"': Kakinada District. 22. Bandaru Srinu, S/o.Jejeiu, age 50 yrs, Malhsala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 23. Sarvasuddi Lakshman S/o.Abbulu, age 55 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 24. Kona Baburao S/o.Suranna, age 60 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. 25. Udumula Suresh S/o.Sathulu, age 35 yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District. 26. Karri Ramakrishna S/o.Raamurthi, age 55yrs, Mallisala village, Jaggampeta Mandal Kakinada District. • Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, particularly a writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 3'”'^ respondent in failing to file the First Information Report (FIR) as per the complaint of the 1®* petitioner dated 24.04.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and a gross abuse of power. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the'circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to take appropriate action against respondents 4 to 26 for illegally demolishing the petitioners' property and for stealing gold, silver, cash, and other valuable items worth approximately 25 lakhs. lA NO: 2 OF 709^ Petition under Section stated in the affidavit filed i - pleased to direct the 3 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be respondent to follow the Supreme Court of India guidelines regarding the registration Lalita Kumari of the First Information Report (FIR) Ors on 12"" November 2013. while ensuring and protecting the rights in vs. Government of U.P. & According to these guidelines both the accused and the of complainant a prelimiinary inquiry should be manner, and in no case should it exceed 7 days. conducted in a time-bound The fact of any delay and the I Diary entry, pending the disposal of the reasons for it must be reflected in the General main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI INAPURAPU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 26; The Court made the following; ORDER SURYANARAYANA to 3: GP FOR HOME NONE APPEARED APHC010290382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14611/2n?5 Between: Vattikuti Seethamahalakshmi and Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.INAPURAPU SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 ORDER:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader appearing for the Home. Assistant 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 1 St petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of 3'^ respondent in not considering the 1®' petitioner's representation dated 24.04.2025. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the petitioner’s representation dated 24.04.2025 will be considered by the 3'"^ respondent, as per law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the 3 respondent to consider the 1®' petitioner’s representation dated 24.04.2025, if not already considered, in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023. 4. rd 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, f any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD t0MAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary Home Department, State of Andhra Secretariat Building Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police., East Godavari District Rajamahendravaram. 3. The Station House Officer, Gokavaram Police Station East Godavari District. 4. One CO to Sri Inapurapu Suryanarayana, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT! 6. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr Pradesh, HIGH COURT DATED;20/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.14611 of 2025 ^ 0 « AUG 2025 Is V'^iiwntSecJIsn^^ DISPOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS