Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20634 (RAJ)

CHHITAR MAL SAINI S/O SADU RAM SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9799/2024 · 2025-09-01

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35003] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9799/2024 Chhitar Mal Saini S/o Sadu Ram Saini, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ward No.03, Darya, Teh. - Khandela, Dayra, (Rural), Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda, Yoga And Natural Medicine, Unani, Siddha, Homeopathy (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Joint Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda, (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Director, Department Of Ayurveda, (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Choudhary for Mr. Vinod Badgujar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 01/09/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the order dated 17.12.2023 in the year 2024 wherein, the petitioner has submitted that universal order is passed by various departments without giving opportunity of hearing and prior intimation. On perusal of the order, it is noted that petitioner is engaged on contractual basis and there is no mandate to provide opportunity of hearing and consideration qua any such dispute is granted in consonance with the terms, conditions and period specified in the contract. [2025:RJ-JP:35003] (2 of 2) [CW-9799/2024] Learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to put forth the present status of the petitioner. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /58