Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20630 (RAJ)

RAMAN NETRIBAL @ JALLAD S/O JUGAL KISHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7087/2025 · 2025-06-26

Sudesh Bansal V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23582] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7087/2025 Raman Netribal @ Jallad S/o Jugal Kishore, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Chandpura Police Station Sadar District Sikar Rajasthan. (At Present Central Jail Jaipur Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7157/2025 Aryan S/o Banwari Lal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Sherpura, Ward No. 5, P.s. Ranoli, District Sikar (At Present In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. B. Sharma Ganthola, Advocate. (in S. B. Crl.M.B No.7087/2025) Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate. (in S. B. Crl.M.B No.7157/2025) For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, Public Prosecutor. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.) Order 26 /06/2025 1. Instant bail applications have been filed by accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.3/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 127(7), 140(2) and 309(6) of Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners argued that allegation against the accused-petitioners in the FIR is of snatching money from the complainant at gun point after taking the [2025:RJ-JP:23582] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7087/2025] complainant to a secluded location on the pretext of gradually transferring the cryptocurrency; accused-petitioners are in custody since 01.05.2025; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused- petitioners involving similar nature of offences; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, accused-petitioners be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. 4. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as learned public prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the nature of allegation leveled against the accused-petitioners and the facts that accused- petitioners are in custody since 01.05.2025; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioners involving similar nature of offences; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Raman Netribal @ Jallad S/o Jugal Kishore and 2. Aryan S/o Banwari Lal shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.)),J Tushar/38-39