Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20626 (RAJ)

BHEEM SINGH SON OF SHRI RAGHUNATH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8914/2025 · 2025-07-01

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23987] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8914/2025 1. Bheem Singh Son Of Shri Raghunath Singh, Aged About 58 Years, Village Dyopura, Post-Kumha, Tehsil And District Bharatpur 2. Deshpal Singh Son Of Shri Gulab Singh, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Village And Post-Bachhamdi (Noh), Tehsil And District-Bharatpur Rajasthan. 3. Babu Son Of Motiram, R/o Village-Burwai, Post Kosi Khurd, Tehsil And District-Mathura Rajasthan. 4. Chandan Singh Son Of Shri Balmukund, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Bajrang Colony, Kumher Gate, Bharatpur Rajasthan. 5. Lakhan Singh Son Of Shri Dulichand, R/o Dhaniram Colony, Near Of SDM Residence, Tehsil-Roopwas, District Bharatpur. 6. Subhash Chand Son Of Vediram, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village And Post Naugaya, Tehsil And District Bharatpur Rajasthan. 7. Foran Singh Son Of Shri Yadram, R/o Village And Post Naugaya, Tehsil And District Bharatpur Rajasthan. 8. Ramdayal Son Of Shri Kailash, R/o Lakhya, Post Veerampura, Tehsil-Bayana, District Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Head, Chief Forest Conservator, Forest Department, Jhalana, Jaipur Rajasthan, Doongri. 2. Chief Forest Conservator Forest Department, Bharatpur. 3. Deputy Forest Conservator (Wild Life), Keoladev Nation Park, Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL [2025:RJ-JP:23987] (2 of 2) [CW-8914/2025] Judgment / Order 01/07/2025 Although, this writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to grant them benefit of 300 privilege leaves but, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they would feel contended if this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to file representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) and the respondents are directed to decide the same in accordance with law. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1. The petitioners are at liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. 2. The respondents are directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law thereupon within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt with communication of the decision to the petitioners. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/45