APHC010290062020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19167/2020 Between: 1. MALTA KANNAJI RAO,, S/O LATE SURYA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, RLAT D.NO.20-226, SURYA NAGAR, KOTHAPALEM, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE POLICE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, GOPALAPATNAM PS, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 5. ALLA PAIDIRAJU, S/O ALLA RAMU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, VENKATESWARA BAR, KOTHAPALEM, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 6. SANAPALA APPARAO, , S/O VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RES/AT D.NO.39-22-10/1, KALINGA NAGAR, MADHAVA DARA, VISAKHAPATNAM TOWN, A.P. 2 7. GANDRETI SHANMUKA BALAJI, , S/O G.V.R.J. MOHAN RAO PATNAIK, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RES/AT D.NO. 45-1-11/F, MUSLIM THATICHETLAPALEM, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM TOWN, A.P. 8. MALLA BANGARU NAIDU, , S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, CELL NO.9542993366, KOTANARAVA POST, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. PARTHASARADHY ACHUTA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to writ order or direction declaring inaction of the respondents 3 and 4 in taking steps under section 145 of Cr P C pertaining to the subject property i e 501 sqaure yards in S No 2082B of Venkatapuram Revenue Village in GoPalapatnam Mandal in Visakhapatnam District on the reports of the petitioner dated 16072020 20072020 and 03102020 as illegal arbitrary unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 16 and 300A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and section 145 of Cr P C and consequently may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to proceed in accordance with section 145 Cr P C …” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. The present petition is filed challenging the notice issued by the Tahsildar by exercising the discretion under Section 145 Cr.P.C. 3 4. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the impugned order is of the year 2020 and no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be closed. 5. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 02.09.2025 ASR 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19167 of 2020 Dated.02.09.2025 ASR