APHC010290092024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 79/2024 Between: Vadapalli (datla) Priyanka Vadapalli Venkata Narasimha Raju Counsel for the Appellant: 1. Dr MAJJI SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V V RAVI PRASAD IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 79/2024 Vadapalli (datla) Priyanka AND Vadapalli Venkata Narasimha Raju ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: Dr MAJJI SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3516] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN NYAPATHY VIJAY FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 79/2024 ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT 2 HBKM,J & HVN,J F.C.A.No.79 of 2024 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal is filed against the order passed by the Family Court in FCOP.No.1686 of 2021, dated 21.05.2024. 3. The appellant herein is the petitioner before the Family Court and the respondent herein is the respondent before the Family Court. The appellant/Mother filed the above said guardian OP seeking declaration of de facto and de jure guardianship of the minor girl, who is in the custody of the appellant/Mother since her birth. During the pendency of the above said OP, the respondent/Father filed I.A.No.1581 of 2023 seeking custody of the child. Thereafter, the appellant/Mother filed a Memo dated 12.05.2024 not pressing the main petition itself. 4. While the order is being dictated in-part, the learned counsel for the appellant interferes and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal, without going into the merits. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 HBKM,J & HVN,J F.C.A.No.79 of 2024 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 03.02.2025 MDP