IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9529 of 2023 Date of Decision:08.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Vinod Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Motta, Advocate, for respondent No.3 _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 08, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?