APHC010289922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14563/2025 Between: 1. V V D PRASAD, S/O. SITARAMANJANEYULU, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.8-559, CANARA BANK ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. G. SUDHAKAR,, S/O. VEKATESWARA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO.303, SIRI APARTMENTS, NEAR SRINIVASA COLLEGE, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILAKALAPUDI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. VENKATA KOTESWARAMMA ADAPALA, , W/O. BASWA RAO, AGED 73 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.19/79, CHILAKAPUDI, REVENUE WARD NO.19, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 HN,J W.P.NO.14563 OF 2025 6. BOKKA UMA, W/O. B.NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 19/79, CHILAKAPUDI, REVENUE WARD NO.19, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. KAMALA PRIYA ADAPALA, W/O. RAVI KUMAR AGED 41 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.19/79, CHILAKAPUDI, REVENUE WARD NO.19, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. ADAPALA DHATRI, D/O. RAVI KUMAR, AGED 25 YEARS, OCC UNEMPLOYED, R/O. D.NO. 19/79, CHILAKAPUDI, REVENUE WARD NO.19, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. BORAGADDA USHA, W/O. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.19/79, CHILAKAPUDI, REVENUE WARD NO.19, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly 4 Respondent at the instance of Respondents 5 to 9 in insisting them to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of Respondents 5 to 9 in connection with disputes arising consequent upon the death of deceased Adabala Ravi Kumar, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority or sanction of law and without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner with petitioners personal life and liberty nor insist them to appear before their authority for settling terms with Respondents 5 to 9 in any respect and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents, particularly 4threspondent not to interfere in any manner with petitioners’ personal life and liberty nor insist the petitioners to appear before their authority for settling any terms with respondents 5 to 9, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 3 HN,J W.P.NO.14563 OF 2025 1. PASALAPUDI SATYA HARITHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 4 HN,J W.P.NO.14563 OF 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14563/2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are troubled by the respondent No.4, at the instance of respondent Nos. 5 to 9 and insisted the petitioners to settle the disputes between the unofficial respondents. The petitioners and unofficial respondents belong to same family and on account of the demise of the 5th respondent son, the dispute between the family members arose. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that on receipt of complaint from the 8th respondent, police have registered the case against the petitioners and that the petitioners are summoned to the police for the purpose of investigation. 3. Recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, it is made clear that the 4th respondent shall not interfere in the civil and family between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 4. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed off. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 26.06.2025 LSP 5 HN,J W.P.NO.14563 OF 2025 165 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14563/2025 26.06.2025 LSP