LUCKY RANI v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
W.P.(CRL)/1825/2025 · 2025-07-11
Neena Bansal Krishna
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20611 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20611 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1825/2025 & CRL.M.A. 17165/2025
LUCKY RANI
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hari Shankar, Mr. Pankaj Sharma and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocates. versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok Sharma and Ms. Pragya Sharma, Advocates for the State with SI Dinesh Kumar P.S. Nand Nagri. CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R %
11.07.2025
1. A Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for issuing directions to the Respondents to save her life and property and also to take Departmental action against Respondent No.10 and 11 for mis-conduct, dereliction of duties and abuse of Authority. 2. It is submitted in the Petition that Respondent No.6 to 11 are engaged in organized activities to lure innocent people by making an offer of getting them government jobs, issuing forged appointment letters and creating fake Government IDs to defraud people of large sums of money. The Respondent No.10 SI Surender and Respondent No.11 SI Sanjeev have been This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2025 at 11:42:33
misusing their position to intimidate victims, prevent registration of FIRs and threaten on false accusations. 3. On 09.01.2025 Respondent No.6 Deepak called the Petitioner at the office complex of SDM, Nand Nagri, where Rs.50,000/- cash was taken by Respondent No.9 Mr. Bhati and balance Rs.50,000/- were given to Respondent No.6. On 10.01.2025 Deepak made a further demand of Rs.30,000/- which was transferred by her into the account of Deepak. In all Rs.11,50,000/- have been paid by the Complainant to the Respondents. 4. However, it is claimed that she has been defrauded by the Respondents for which she gave written Complaint against Respondent No.6 to 11, but no action has been taken, nor is there any protection given to her life and liberty. The present Writ Petition has accordingly been filed. 5. Learned APP for State submits that on the Complaint of the Petitioner FIR No.390/2025 udner Section 318(2)/335(A)(i)/336(2)/340(2)/3(5) BNS, 2023 P.S. Nand Nagri has already been registered. 6.
Essentially, the grievance of the Petitioner was that she had been defrauded of huge amounts and despite her Complaint the FIR was not registered; instead she was being threatened by Respondent No.13 and 14 to dissuade her from getting the Complaint registered. 7. Since, the FIR has already been registered, no further directions are merited in the present Petition, which is hereby disposed of along with the pending Application(s). NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JULY 11, 2025 va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2025 at 11:42:33