Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20605 (CHH)

Ujjwal Diwan v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/980/2022 · 2025-02-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6238-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 980 of 2022 1 - Ujjwal Diwan S/o Gouri Shankar Diwan Aged About 35 Years R/o Near Bright Mookbadhir School, Kadambari, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Civil And Revenu District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - S. Santosh Kumar S/o V. Shreedhar, Aged About 34 Years R/o L.I.G. 305, Housing Board Colony, Khilora, Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattigarh. 3 - Naveen Rao S/o Late Devendra Rao, Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 17, Shakti Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sanjive Mishra S/o Shri Ramlal Mishra, Aged About 35 Years R/o H. No. 35, Sai Pairadais, Amlidih Mode, Devpuri Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Home Affairs, Mantalaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Superintendent Of Police Bijapur, District Bijapur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Station House Officer, Police Station Bijapur, District Bijapur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ubeja, Panel Lawyer. 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 04/02/2025 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioners in repeated calls. Mr. S. S. Ubeja, Panel Lawyer, appearing for the respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "1. Call for the status report of the investigation carried out of the concerned police in the impugned FIR being crime 3/2018 registered at police station Bijapur. 2. Quash the FIR in crime no. 5/2022 registered at police station Bijapur so far as the petitioner herein is concerned." 3. learned State counsel would submit that in the present case after the investigation charges have been framed and the case is fixed for prosecution evidence. 4. None appears for the petitioners to press this petition. It appears that no interim order has been passed in this case and during efflux of time the petitioners have lost his interest in pursuing the present petition, hence, the writ petition is dismissed. 5. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court for compliance and necessary action. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.02.05 15:51:17 +0530