2025:JHHC:20795 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3959 of 2025 Haresh Ansari @ Harhej Ansari, S/o Sohrab Miyan, R/o Village- Ranidih (Satua Tola), P.O.+P.S. Godda (M), District- Godda .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). …… CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, AddI. P.P. …...... 02/ 29.07.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This is an application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of under Sections 482 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Surksha Sanhita, 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences under Sections 147/148/149/341/323/427/307/353 of IPC and under Section 26 of Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of Children Act, in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No.264 of 2019, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he and others obstructed public servant and the police from performing their duty and they also assaulted the police. 4. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, which is of obstructing the public servant, I find that this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. 7. Petitioner should appear before the concerned Court. If the petitioner appears before the court concerned, his cases shall be considered individually considering the individual overt acts of the petitioner and also the status of the other co-accused persons. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./