Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2060 (AP)

C IMAN v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6106/2025 · 2026-06-17

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010120672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6106/2025 Between: 1. C IMAN, S/O R RAJA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O D.NO.27-94, 6TH CROSS, RAM NAGAR COLONY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS (PUBLIC TRANSPORT) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, (APSRTC),VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. THE DISTRICT PUBLIC TRANSPORT OFFICER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPOT MANAGER DEPOT1, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR 2 DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly the 3rd Respondent in issuing proceedings No. C1 /T2/122(2)/2021 -RM(T)/DPTO dated 12.02.2025 terminating the license No. T2/122(2)/2021- RM(T) dt.18.02.2021 of the Petitioner which is issued to run the business of Sweets and Bakery stall at OS No.2, as being illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently set aside the proceedings No.C1/T2/122(2)/2021-RM(T)/DPTO dated 12.02.2025 issued by the 3rd Respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No.C1/T2/122(2)/2021- RM(T)/DPTO dated 12.02.2025 and permit him to run the shop, pending the disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AJAY KUMAR KANAPARTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) 2. GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Ms.D.H.S.Sandhya, learned counsel representing Sri Ajay Kumar Kanaparthi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 18th June, 2026 RKS