Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:24175-DB Court No. - 46 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3286 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev And Another Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Yadav,Shalini Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition seeks quashing of the FIR dated 23.01.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No. 0006 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, 109, 333, 324 B.N.S. Act, 2023, Police Station-Amritpur, District- Fatehgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from the allegation made in the first information report, prima facie no offence, complained of, is disclosed against the petitioner and, as such, the instant first information report is liable to be quashed. 4. Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the said prayer and pointed out that in the instant case petitioners are said to have assaulted one Kiran Lata consequent to which she received injuries on her person and has been medically examined. He has further submitted that from the allegation made in the first information report, prima facie offence, complained of is clearly disclosed against the petitioner and, as such, the first information report cannot be quashed in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and in a recent decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Criminal Appeal No. 843 of 2024, Directorate Enforcement Vs. Niraj Tyagi and others. 5. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations made in the first information report and the relevant law cited by the learned AGA and the fact that impugned first information report discloses cognizable offence, we are of the opinion that the impugned first information report cannot be quashed. 6. The prayer for quashing of the first information report is therefore, refused. 7. However, in case the petitioner files an application for anticipatory/regular bail before the trial court, his bail application be considered and disposed of as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. 8. With these observations, the instant writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Israr Digitally signed by :- ISRAR AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad