MOHD.ASHRAF v. R.K.GOYAL,PRINCIPAL SECY.HOME DEPTT. AND ORS.
CPSW/48/2018 · 2025-09-16
Ma Chowdhary
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2059 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2059 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 48/2018
Mohd. Ashraf
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
R. K. Goyal & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (16.09.2025)
01. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So was the case on the previous date of hearing as well, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further may be because the order sought to be enforced has been implemented.
02. Be that as it may, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to seek restoration of the instant contempt petition, in case cause survives.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
16.09.2025
Bunty
Sr. No. 46 Bunty Kumar 2025.09.18 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document