Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14470 WP No. 9245 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 9245 OF 2024 (LR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. H. K. SIDDAPPA S/O LATE KADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.218/1 VANNIGARAPETE, 1ST WARD, DODDABALLAPURA 561 203. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARI KRISHNA K. A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203.
2.
THE TAHASILDAR DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI S., HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 31.10.2018 PASSED IN CASE NO. LRF SR(D) 95/2014-15 BY THE R-1 DECLARING THAT THE PURCHASE MADE BY PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY. NO. 40/3 MEASURING 0.02.08 GUNTAS SITUATED AT KHASABHAG VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLPAURA TALUK IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 79(A) AND (B) OF KLR ACT VIDE ANNX-A.
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14470 WP No. 9245 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
ORAL ORDER
1. An order of vesting passed by the Assistant Commissioner for contravention of Section 79A & B of the Land Reforms Act ("the Act", for short) is challenged in this petition.
2. The petitioner has produced the
order sheet maintained by the Assistant Commissioner. A perusal of said order sheet would indicate that there was no mention that notice was in fact served on the petitioner. In fact the entire order sheet maintained basically indicates that the proceedings were being adjourned due to unavailability of the Presiding Officer and ultimately, the order was passed stating that Sections 79A & B of the Act were contravened which required an order of vesting to be passed. It is therefore clear that the impugned order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14470 WP No. 9245 of 2024
3. Since the order of vesting would take away the rights of the ownership of land in question, the appropriate course would be to afford one more opportunity to the petitioner.
4. In the normal course, the matter would have to be remanded to the Assistant Commissioner, since Sections 79A & B of the Act were omitted by virtue of an amendment to the Land Reforms Act, no useful purpose would be served by remanding the matter to the Assistant Commissioner and hence, the impugned proceedings initiated shall stand abated.
5. In view of the above, the revenue authorities to restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue record.
6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE PKS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0