Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20584 (RAJ)

MANISH PARIHAR S/O BABULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7047/2025 · 2025-07-14

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26158] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7047/2025 Manish Parihar S/o Babulal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plot No 217, Vijay Nagar Yojana, Behind P.F., Police Station Chopasni, Housing Board, Jodhpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tushar Bhatnagar with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma and Mr. Anuj Pareekh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 14/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0074/2025 registered at Police Station- Vidhayakpuri, District-Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 308(4), 308(5), 351(3) of BNS and Section 66 of the IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegations against the petitioner is that he has provided the mobile phone to other co-accused and it is co-accused, who has threatened to kill the Deputy CM through mobile call to ASI posted at PCR Commissionerate Jaipur. He further submits that as per the prosecution, initially, the Mobile was handed over to Waseem Khan, who has already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 13.05.2025. Besides it, he has submitted that other co- accused Junaid and Mohammed Ashraf have also been released on bail [2025:RJ-JP:26158] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7047/2025] on 13.05.2025 and the case of the present petitioner is akin to them. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 01.04.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that as per status report filed by the prosecution, allegation of giving threatening on phone to kill the Deputy CM is attributed to another co-accused-Vikram Singh but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Manish Parihar S/o Babulal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/22