[2025:RJ-JP:23697] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1476/2025 Murad Ali S/o Mohammad Atik, Aged About 19 Years, Ro Opp Peer Baba Ki Majar Khanpura Road Chishti Nagar Ps Ramganj District Ajmer (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer District Ajmer) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Sandeep S/o Udayram Deedwania, R/o Chishtinagar Khanpur Ramganj Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 840/2025 Aman Khan S/o Late Yamin Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Chishti Nagar, Ward No. 33, P.s. Ramganj District Ajmer (At Presently Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Sandeep @ Sanju S/o Udairam Didwaniya, R/o Chishti Nagar, Khanpura Road, Ajmer ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 924/2025 Sameer Khan S/o Salamuddin, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Chisti Nagar Ward No. 33, Police Station Ramganj District Ajmer (Rajasthan ) (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Amer) ----Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Sandeep S/o Udairam Deedwania, R/o Chisti Nagar Khanpura Ramganj Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. N.A. Naqvi, Sr. Adv. Assisted by Mr. Syed Adeel Naqvi [2025:RJ-JP:23697] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-1476/2025] Mr. Nirmal Kumar Nagar Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V. J.) Order 27/06/2025 1. Instant appeals have been filed under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 on behalf of the appellants, who are in custody in connection with FIR No.98/2025 at Police Station Ramganj, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 109(1) of BNS, and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3 (2)(V)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2. It has been argued that omnibus allegations of causing injuries are against several persons. No specific injury is attributed to any of the appellants; the injuries caused to injured Sandeep (complainant) are on non-vital part (leg) and other injuries are simple in nature. Appellants are having no criminal antecedents (except Aman as there is one criminal case pending against appellant- Aman) 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that information to the complainant has already been sent. However, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant. 4. Heard. 5. Taking into consideration the omnibus nature of allegations against the appellants; nature of injuries, appellants are in custody since long; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners and the conclusion of the trial may take considerable [2025:RJ-JP:23697] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-1476/2025] time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the appellants on bail. 6. Consequently, the instant appeals are allowed. The impugned orders passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Ajmer is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellants Murad Ali S/o Mohammad Atik, Aman Khan S/o Late Yamin Khan, Sameer Khan S/o Salamuddin arrested in aforesaid FIR, shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case, provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL (V. J.)),J ashu /91-93