[2025:RJ-JP:24945] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3327/2025 Vishnu @ Himanshu Pareek S/o Shri Kailashchand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Juliyasar, P.s. Nechhwa, Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Sampta Kumar @ Boduram S/o Madan Lal, Through Its Legal Heir Kushal (Victim) R/o Juliyasar, P.s. Nechhwa, Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravikant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Babu lal Nasuna HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/07/2025 The instant criminal miscellaneous petition has been preferred under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing and setting aside the proceedings pertaining to FIR No. 132/2017 registered with police station Nechhwa, Sikar for the offences under section 323, 324, 342 read with section 34 of the IPC. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the police after investigation has submitted the charge-sheet against the present petitioner under Sections 147, 149, 323, 324 and 342 of the IPC. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the victim Kushal Sharma S/o Late. Shri Sampat Kumar Sharma has entered into compromise with the petitioner and executed a compromise deed dated 22.01.2025 and the learned trial court vide order dated 21.04.2025, verified the said compromise [2025:RJ-JP:24945] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3327/2025] entered between the parties and acquitted the petitioner for the offences under Sections 323 and 342 of the IPC. The prosecution has been continued qua the petitioner for the offence under Sections 147, 149 and 324 of the IPC. Therefore, on the basis of the compromise entered between the injured and petitioner, the proceedings against the petitioner may be quashed. Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, Adv. appears on behalf of victim Kushal Sharma concedes that compromise have been entered between the parties and the petitioner has been acquitted for the offences under Sections 323 and 342 of the IPC, by the learned trial court and if the proceedings qua the petitioner is quashed then the victim has no objection. Learned Public prosecutor has vehementally opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard and perused the material available on the record. The complainant in the present matter is the father of victim Kushal Sharma. Victim Kushal Sharma has submitted a written compromise before the concerned trial court describing the fact that he has entered into compromise with the present petitioner. The said compromise was duly verified by the learned trial court and vide order dated 21.04.2025, learned trial court acquitted the petitioner for the offences under Sections 323 and 342 of the IPC. The remaining alleged offences against the petitioner are Sections 147, 149 and 324 of IPC. The alleged offences are neither grave nor impacting the society at large, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:24945] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3327/2025] Therefore, considering the above facts, this court deems it appropriate to quash the criminal proceedings pending qua the petitioner arising out of FIR No. 132/2017 registered with police station Nechhwa, District Sikar. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /285