Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2058 (HP)

SOMA DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/21162/2025 · 2026-01-05

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.21148 & 21162 of 2025 Decided on: 05.01.2026 1. CWP No. 21148/2025 Saroj Bala Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents 2. CWP No. 21162/2025 Soma Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Loveneesh Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in both the petitions. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners grievance are that their representations of different dates (Annexure P-6) seeking applicability of Surya Prabha and others Versus State 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 of H.P. and others2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, both writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners of different dates (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Surya Prabha2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. Both writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 05, 2026 Judge yogesh 2 CWP No.5390 of 2024, decided on 28.05.2025