Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20573 (AP)

IFIT SPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14402/2025 · 2025-07-21

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010289292025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.14402 OF 2025 Between: 1. IFIT SPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED, Having its office at A-14, Prem Plaza Indira Nagar, Ayodhya Road, Lucknow - 225 016, Uttar Pradesh Rep by its authorizedsignatory, Mr. Vikas Jaiswal ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati. 2. The State Project Director, Samagra Shiksha, State Implementation Society KBC Boys High School Premises, Opposite Rythu Bazar, Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh - 520 010 3. Government EMarketplace, Represented by its Chairperson III Floor, Jeevan Bharti Building, Tower- 2, Connaught Circus, New Delhi - 110 001 4. M/s Excel Sports, Having its office at 115/R Sarat Ghosh Garden Road Kamala Park, Dhakuria, Kolkata - 730 031 West Bengal ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the SRK, J WP No.14402 of 2025 2 High Court may be pleased to issue any order or a direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents in disqualifying the petitioner technically from the bid no. GEM/2025/B/5943142 via website order dated 09.05.2025 issued by the respondent no.2 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the settled principles of law and consequently set aside the actions of the respondents in disqualifying the petitioner thereby direct the respondents to open the financial bid of the petitioner in the bid no. GEM/2025/B/5943142 dated 12.02.2025 and award the contract to the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.BADRINATH Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Sri VENKAT CHALASANI SRK, J WP No.14402 of 2025 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed to declare the action of the respondents in disqualifying the petitioner technically from bid No.GEM/2025/B/5943142 via website order dated 09.05.2025 of respondent No.2 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to open the financial bid of the petitioner in bid No.GEM/2025/B/5943142 dated 12.02.2025 and award the contract to the petitioner. 2. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Sri D. Sivadarshan, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P. Badrinath, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:22.07.2025 Nsr SRK, J WP No.14402 of 2025 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.14402 of 2025 Date:22.07.2025 Nsr