2025:JHHC:22115-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 841 of 2025 --- Satish Mahato @ Satish Kumar Mahato --- --- Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Respondent --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava --- For the appellant : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Adv. For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P --- 02/06.08.2025 Heard Mr. Pratiush Lala, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Kumari Rashmi, learned A.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad in A.B.P. No. 1081 of 2025 arising out of Barwadda P.S. Case No. 149 of 2021, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that some miscreants had thrown bombs at Kia showroom which resulted in damage to some vehicles. Submission has been advanced by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been implicated primarily on account of the fact that the motorcycle which was used by the main accused in hurling bombs at Kia showroom belonged to the appellant. It has been submitted that some of the co-accused persons similarly situated have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned trial court in A.B.P. No.2179 of 2024 and A.B.P. No.1113 of 2025. It has further been submitted that the appellant does not have any criminal antecedent and is an employee in the Tata Motors. Ms. Kumari Rashmi, learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant. Regard being had to the fact that the some of the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below apart from the fact that there is no direct evidence which would indicate about the participation of the appellant in throwing explosive substances at 2 Kia showroom in Dhanbad, we while setting aside the order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad in A.B.P. No. 1081 of 2025 arising out of Barwadda P.S. Case No. 149 of 2021, direct the appellant above named to surrender in the court below within four weeks and pray for bail, and in that event, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad in A.B.P. No. 1081 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This appeal stands allowed and disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Shamim/