Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20558 (AP)

Dommeti Satyavathi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13255/2019 · 2025-08-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010288052019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13255/2019 Between: 1. DOMMETI SATYAVATHI, W/O. SRI SATYANARAYANA, AGE 64 YEARS, OCCHOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF MATTAPARRU VILLAGE, PODURU MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU, A.P 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PENUGONDA POLICE STATION, PENUGONDA, PENUGONDA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENUGONDA POLICE STATION, PENUGONDA, PENUGONDA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order 2 or direction, preferably one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, especially the action of the 4th respondent in calling the petitioner and her family to the police station in the name of investigation without following the procedure contemplated under CRPC and other applicable laws is illegal, discriminatory, arbitrary, malafide, in violation of the right of the petitioner and her family members and the rights guaranteed under the 14, 21 of the constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to call the petitioner and her family members to penugonda police station without issuance of notice contemplated under law/Cr.P.C. consequently direct the respondent no.2 to enquire into the matter in order to take necessary action on the issue and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N N SOMENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13255 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri N.N.Somendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13255 of 2019 Date: 22.08.2025 PSA