Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20554 (KAR)

V MANOJKUMAR v. TAHSILDHAR

WP/8237/2025 · 2025-03-26

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12814 WP No. 8237 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 8237 OF 2025 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: V.MANOJKUMAR S/O VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT DHARMARAYASWAMY TEMPLE BEEDI ANEKAL, BENGALURU – 582 106. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SACHIN B. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TAHSILDHAR ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL, BENGALURU – 582 106. 2. COMMISSIONER FOR HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, SHRI MINTO ANJENEYA BHAVAN ALUR VENKATARAMANA ROAD CHAMRAJAPETE, BENGALURU – 560 018. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRATHIBHA R. K., AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 14.02.2025 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNX-A WITHIN A TIME FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12814 WP No. 8237 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court on a circumstance that his representation dated 14.02.2025, has gone unheeded. 2. Heard Sri Sachin B.S., learned counsel for petitioner and Smt. Prathibha R.K., learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a notice dated 21.03.2025, is received yesterday i.e., on 25.03.2025. Therefore, he would seek a week’s time to submit his reply and also request that the representation be considered after submission of his reply. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the notice is issued seeking to furnish certain documents from the hands of the petitioner. 5. In the light of the aforesaid submissions, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition with a direction to the petitioner to furnish the documents within one week from - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12814 WP No. 8237 of 2025 today, and in the event, the documents are submitted, the representation shall merit consideration within one week, at the hands of the respondents, thereafter. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25 CT:SS