Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2055 (RAJ)

SHRIMAN MEENA S/O SHRI BHAMBURAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16155/2025 · 2026-02-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16155/2025 Shriman Meena S/o Shri Bhamburam Meena, ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Hardik Singh and Mr. Rahul Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayers: "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and i) by appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to adjust the petitioner on supernumerary post or pay salary under the provision of Section 20(4) of Act 2016 looking to his 79% permanent disability with all consequential benefit. ii) by appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to release due salary and other service benefits to the petitioner. The arrears of salary and other benefits may also be released with interest @ 6% p.a. iii) by appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may further be directed to pay salary to the petitioner on month to month basis regularly and other service benefits in terms of section 20(4) of the Act 2016 and after attaining the age of superannuation, he may be released all retiral benefits. iv) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court (2 of 2) [CW-16155/2025] deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the Petitioner. v) Cost may also be awarded in favour of petitioner." 2. The judgment is pronounced in open court. 3. See separate order for reasons. 4. The writ petition is partly allowed and the respondent(s) are directed to consider the case of present petitioner under Section 20(4) of RPWD Act, 2015 for assigning him any other duty provided he is unable to discharge his duty in view of his permanent disability which has to be assessed on periodical basis, strictly in accordance with Chapter-X of the RPWD Act, 2016. 5. With aforesaid, the writ petition along with misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /135