RIYAJ HUSSAIN @ RAJU S/O SUBRATI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLAS/2744/2025 · 2026-03-27
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2051 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2051 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2744/2025 Riyaj Hussain @ Raju S/o Subrati, aged about 33 Years, R/o Hada Market, Sultanpur, Police Station Sultanpur, District Kota. (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Kota, District Kota). ----Appellant Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Thorugh P.P.
2. Satish Kumar S/o Gopal Lal, R/o Ramdev Ji Ke Mohalla, Sultanpur, Kota Rural, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr.Abdul Rahil Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.S. Dhakar, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 27/03/2026
1. The instant criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on behalf of the appellant against the impugned order dated 14.05.2025 passed by the Special Court, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Kota whereby, the bail application preferred by the appellant under Section 483 BNSS was rejected by the Trial Court. The appellant has been arrested by the Investigating Agency in connection with the FIR No.87/2025, registered at the Police Station Sultanpur, District Kota Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 117(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2) & 191(3) BNS and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v) & 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act.
(2 of 2) [CRLAS-2744/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the allegations levelled against the accused-appellant indicating that an on the thigh of the injured-Satish was caused by a shap edged weapon, however, the same was found to be simple in nature. Counsel submits that the appellant has been in custody since 13.04.2025 and since the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, the indulgence of bail may be granted to the appellant.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the appellant.
4. Heard. Perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the appellant and looking to the fact that the injury assigned to the appellant has been found to be simple in nature and looking to the fact that the appellant has been in custody since 13.04.2025. Hence, the indulgence of bail is also extended to the appellant.
6. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned
order dated 14.05.2025 passed by the Special Court, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Kota is set aside. It is ordered that the accused–appellant Riyaj Hussain @ Raju S/o Subrati arrested in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond for the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties for the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /47