Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20509 (CHH)

INDRAWATI SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4156/2018 · 2025-07-03

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:30549 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4156 of 2018 1 - Indrawati Singh W/o Shri Narendra Singh Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Datima P.S. Vishrampur Tahsil - Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Thakur Singh S/o Shri Tejram Aged About 40 Years R/o Village - Salka P.S. And Tahsil Premnagar District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Panchayat Directorate Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat - Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Priyanka Singh W/o Manoj Kumar R/o Krishnapur Post - Bhthikal, District - Surguja, Presently Posted As Lecturer Panchaya High School Patna Block - Ramanujnagar District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Jasinta Toppo Posted On The Posted Of Lecturer Panchayat High School Khadgawan Block - Bhaiyathan District - Surajpur R/o Mishragali Bhaiyathan Road Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Shubham Tiwari, Advocate holding the brief of Shri A.N. Pandey, Advocate. SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- For Respondent/ State : Shri Pramod Shrivastava, Dy.G.A. For Respondent No.5 : Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 04.07.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners pleads no instructions in the matter. 2. Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi