Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:23195 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP Nos.
11429, 11431, 11472,
11465
of 2025
Decided on:
17 th July
, 2025
__________________________________________________ CWP No.11429 of 2025 M/s Sunoxx International Pvt. Ltd.
....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents ___________________________________________________ CWP No.11431 of 2025 M/s Cent Cure Pvt. Ltd.
....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents ___________________________________________________ CWP No.11472 of 2025 M/s Chillaru Resorts
....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents ___________________________________________________ CWP No.11465 of 2025 Smt. Vijay Chauhan ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
For the petitioner(s): Ms. Aprajita, Advocate, for Mr. Ajay Thakur,
Advocate,
for
the petitioner(s) in CWP Nos.11429 and 1431 of 2025. Mr. Vaibhav Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No.11472 of
2025. Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No.11465 of 2025. For the respondents: Mr. Avinash Jaryal and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel & Mr. Anshul Attri and Mr. Kunal Thakur,
Central
Government Counsel, for the respondents-UOI, in the respective cases. Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Avinash Jaryal and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, Mr. Anshul Attri and Mr. Kunal Thakur, Central Government Counsel, and Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, appear and accept notice on behalf of the respective respondents.
2. The Counsels have contended that the present cases can be disposed of in view of the detailed order passed 2
in LPA No.169 of 2025 titled as Union of India and another vs. Atul Sharma and others, decided on 16.07.2025. Their statements are taken on record.
3. Keeping in view the above, we dispose of the present petitions in the same terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( G.S. Sandhawalia ) Chief Justice 17 th July
, 2025
( Ranjan Sharma ) (ankit) Judge 3