Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20494 (RAJ)

M/S ZUBERI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8533/2025 · 2025-05-30

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22592] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8533/2025 M/s Zuberi Engineering Construction Private Limited, Having Its Registered Office At H-4/58 Azad Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur- 302001 (Rajasthan) Through Its Authorsed Signatory Mr. Satish Agarwal S/o Shri Prem Narayan Agarwal. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Additional Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department Project Region, Ajmer. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Bhilwara, Bhilwara. 4. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Project Division, Shahpura, District Bhilwara. 5. Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 6. The Chief Engineer (Jal Jeevan Mission), Public Health Engineering Department, Jal Bhawan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaivardhan Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, makes a limited submission that respondent No.2 may be directed to consider and decide his pending representation dated 12.05.2025 while keeping in mind the mandate of Condition No. 36E of the [2025:RJ-JP:22592] (2 of 2) [CW-8533/2025] General Conditions appended with the tender document, by way of passing a well reasoned order at the earliest. In light of such limited submission, this writ petition stands disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 that he shall consider and decide the representation dated 12.05.2025 filed by the petitioner within a period of ‘fifteen days’ by way of passing a well reasoned order strictly in accordance with law from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Counsel for the petitioner is also directed to place the certified copy of this order before respondent No.2. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /143