[2025:RJ-JP:20336] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9054/2024 Smt. Omlata Sharma Wife of Shri Rajendra Parashar, Aged About 44 Years, Resident of Village And Post Mudhera, Tehsil Uchchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department of Women And Child Development Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, 2, Jal Path, Gandhinagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Deputy Director, Department of Women Empowerment, A-11, Near Dr. Girdhari Lal Agarwal, Jawahar Nagar, Bharatpur. (Raj.) 4. Child Development Project Officer, Roopbas, District Bharatpur. (Raj.) 5. Child Development Project Officer, Uchchain, District Bharatpur. (Raj.) 6. Smt. Dev Kumari W/o Shri Vinod Kumar, R/o Kunder Tehsil Uchchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma Mr. SM Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Pushpendra Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 14/05/2025 1. Instant civil writ petition was preferred by petitioner, assailing the order dated 01.04.2024, passed by the Deputy Director, Department of Women and Child Development, cancelling [2025:RJ-JP:20336] (2 of 2) [CW-9054/2024] the appointment of petitioner on the post of Aanganwadi worker at Aanganwadi Centre Kunder, Tehsil Uchchain, District Bharatpur. 2. Counsel for petitioner, pointed out that the order dated 01.04.2024 was also challenged by the petitioner by way of filing Appeal No.09/2024 before the concerned Additional District Collector, Bharatpur. That appeal has been decided on merits vide judgment dated 30.04.2025 and the order impugned dated 01.04.2024 has been quashed. Hence, in view of judgment dated 30.04.2025, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.6, oppose the prayer of petitioner to allow withdrawal of her writ petition and submits that judgment dated 30.04.2025 is perverse. 4. Taking into consideration the rival submissions of both the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to grant liberty to respondent No.6 to challenge the judgment dated 30.04.2025 passed by the Additional District Collector, Bharatpur in Appeal No.09/2024. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/48