JUGANI AND 13 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/4799/2025 · 2025-03-03
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20488 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20488 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30613 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4799 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jugani And 13 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aniruddh Azad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature Certiorari quash the impugned order dated 30-01-2025 (Annexure No. 12) Passed by the respondent no. 2 i.e. District Magistrate, District Siddharth Nagar The respondent no. 2 has not acceded the request made by the petitioners with latter dated 28-01-2025.
2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and restraining the respondents not to pass any order during the pendency of the Report under Section 64 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
3. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restrain the respondent authorities from eviction/demolition of petitioners houses over the land of gata nos. 179 and 411 in village Belwalagunahi Thappa Kesaraha, Pargana Bansi Purab, Tehsil- Bansi District-Siddharth Nagar which was allotted to them till the adjudication of aforesaid case no. 1261 of 2023 (Computerised Case No.D202317630001261) and case no. 1144 of 2024 (Computerised Case No.D202417630001144), to meet with ends of justice."
3. The final order has been passed under Section 66 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha as well as learned Standing Counsel that against the order passed under Section 66 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the petitioners have alternative remedy of filing a revision.
5. In view of above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order impugned by filing a revision. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad