Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20487 (AP)

Killi Murali @ Tuni Ramana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/5991/2025 · 2025-07-02

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

'__ -; I_5ZS-: .i lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :`PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETl"ON NO: 5991 OF 2025 Between I --._Fg*frfft Killi Murali @ Tuni Ramana, S/o. Talupulayya, aged about 40 years R/o. Ta]Iuru Village, Tuni MandaI, Kakinada District, A.P Petitioner/Accused-7 AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Respondent/Complainant Petition under sections 437 a 439 of Cr.P.C, (New Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.7 on bail pending disposal of Crime No.78/2024 of Narsipatnam Rural P.S., now AnakapaIIi District COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONE`R-I : SRI| GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT .I PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER APHCO10287222025 EELE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original JurisdictI-On) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY Between : £BLMINAL PETITION NO: 5991/2025 [3327] 1.KILLI MURALl @ TUNI RAMANAH S/O. TALUPULAYYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O. TALLURU VILLAGE, TUNI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, A.P ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT petition under section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS prayi.ng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of crimlnal PetitI'On, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.7 on bail pending disposal of crime No.78/2024 of Narsipatnam Rural P.S., now Anakapalle DistrI'Ct and to pass Counsel for the petitioner/accused: 1. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complaI-nant.- 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the foIIowI-ng: ORDER: ThI'S Criminal petition, under sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, has been fI'Ied by the petitioner/A7, seekI'ng bail, in Crime No.78/2024 of Narsipatnam Rural Police Station, Anakapalle Dl-strict. t=- c.`--``9 _,_P 2 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner and others for the offences under sections 20(b)(j[')(C), 25 read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropjc substances Act. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 10.4,2024 at about o4.00am, on receipt of credible information regarding illegal possession and transportation of ganja, the s.I of Police, along wl'th staff and mediators rushed to NeIIimetta Junction and started conducting vehicle checking. At that time, police observed four persons coming in an auto and one person on motorcycle. On seeing police, the inmates in the auto and the rider of the motorcycle stopped theI-r respective Vehicles and trI-ed tO escape. Then police apprehended four persons while the others escaped. on interrogation, they disclosed their identity partI'Culars as that of Al to A4 and police seized 267 kgs of ganja from their possession. They confessed the involvement of A7 I'n transportation Of the ganja. Police seI'Zed the contraband, arrested the accused and got him remanded to judicial custody. Police arrested the petI-tiOner On 05.5.2025 and since then the petitl-oner is in judicial remand. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-state. perused the record. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the court may pass appropriate orders. `'.- E``9 rty ` L* 3 6. A perusal of the material available on record goes to show that the Petitioner Was arrested and remanded to judicI'al Custody On 05.5.2025. PoII'Ce On Credible information seized 267 kgs of ganja from the other accused. pursuant to the confessional statement of co-accused, the PetI'tiOner Was arrested. No incriminatI-ng material has been seized from the petitioner to connect the petitioner with the crime. Basing on the confessional statement of co-accused, the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody. 7. In view of the aforesaI'd facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant baI'l tO the PetitI®Oner/A7 herein, on the following conditions. (I|) The petitioner/A7 herein sha" be released on his executing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional DI'StriCt and Sessions Judge-Gum-special Judge for Trial of Offences under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam,I (ill) On release, the petitioner shall appear before the stall-On House officer concerned once lan a Week i.e. on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 05.00 p.m., tI'll filing of charge sheet. 8. Accordingly, the crI-minaI Petition is allowed. SD/-M.sRINi'VAs j\ lE`-I--_ _ A`SSISTANT For SECTj //TRUE COPY// jSTRAR To, 1. The I Additional District & Sessions Judge-Special JIJdge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnain 2. The superintendent, central PrI'SOn, Visakhapatnam 3. The Station House officer, NarsI'Patnam Rural P.S., nowAnakapaIIi District 4. One CC to SRl. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofA P[OUT] 6. One spare copy HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED : 03/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5991 of 2025 ALLOWED