[2025:RJ-JP:26163] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8827/2025 1. Mahendra Kumar Purohit S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Purohit, Aged About 64 Years, R/o 36, Mama Residency, Housing Board, Near Baghodaya Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh, 2. Hanuman Chhanang S/o Shri Bhagirath Chhanang, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 28 , Mama Residency, Housing Board, Near Baghodaya Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh. 3. Om Prakash Sharma S/o Jai Narayan Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, Mama Residency, Housing Board, Near Baghodaya Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh. 4. Kapil Malpani S/o S/o Shri Bhagirath Chhanang, Aged About 47 Years, Mama Residency, Housing Board, Near Baghodaya Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh. 5. Sitaram Bang S/o Shri Ratanlal Bang Bhagirath Chhannang, Aged About 62 Years, R/o 32, Mama Residency, Housing Board, Near Baghodaya Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh. 6. Pankaj Bang S/o Shri Amarchand Bang, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 35, Mama Residency, Housing Board, Near Baghodaya Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Municipal Council, Kishahgarh Through Secretary, Killa Ka Chok , Tanga Stand, Purani City, Kishagarh, District Ajmer. 2. Commissioner, Municipal Council Kishangarh, Killa 3. Deepak Hasani S/o Mohan Das Hasani, R/o Aditiya Mills Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh, District Ajmer. 4. Town Planner, Ajmer Zone, Department Of Town Planner, Ajmer, Deepak Nagar, Jaipur Road, Ajmer . ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Madhusudan Singh Rajpurohit JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order [2025:RJ-JP:26163] (2 of 2) [CW-8827/2025] 14/07/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner for issuing directions to decide the representation submitted by the petitioners before the respondent-Authorities, expeditiously as early as possible within a time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for redressal of the grievances, the petitioners approached the respondent- Authorities by way of filing representation, but in spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the representation of the petitioners has not been decided by the respondents, by passing of reasoned and speaking order, therefore, appropriate directions be issued to the Authorities to decide the same within a stipulated time. 3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the respondents to decide the representation expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from today, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 4. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/ order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same. strictly in accordance with law. 5. The instant writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /184