- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17782 WP No. 7494 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 7494 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI THIRU ALLANGADU IMMUDI DHARMA SHIVA ACHARYA VYSYYA MUTT REPRESENTED BY ITS MATHADHIPATHI SRI. SHANKARA SUBRAMANYA SHIVA ACHARYA SWAMIGAL AT BURUBHOETTAI, BHAVANI TALUK ERODE DISTRICT TAMILNADU REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI. KOTHANDAN RAVI, S/O. KOTHANDAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, NO. 206/6, CANARA BANK LAYOUT ENTRANCE, KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 097. (THE HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ACT 1977) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ZONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER (SOUTH) BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANGARA PALIKE JAYANAGAR 2ND BLOCK, JAYA NAGAR EAST, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560011. 2. THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER BRHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17782 WP No. 7494 of 2025 HUDSON CIRCLE, J.C. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 002. 3. SMT. K. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA WIFE OF LATE. K. VENKATARAMAIAH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS NO. 71, CHIKKAMAVALLI SUSHEELA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004 REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER - SRI.L. ANANTHA S/O. LATE LAKSHMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO. 336/2, 7TH CROSS, KRISHNADEVARAYA ROAD, LAKSHMIPURA, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 019. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SATYANAND B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 SRI. V.B.SHIVAKUMAR ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2025 PASSED BY THE R1 AUTHORITY IN APPEAL NO. 01/2024, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as hereunder: "The Petitioner submits that it has challenged the interim order passed by the Revisional Authority in as much as staying the construction over the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17782 WP No. 7494 of 2025 subject property. The Petitioner does not press the above Writ Petition and the same may be dismissed reserving the liberty to the Petitioner to question the correctness of the orders that may be passed by the Revisional Authority on the merits of the case under Section 150 of the BBMP Act." 2. In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as not pressed reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned orders before the appropriate Authority exercising the power under statutory scheme. 3. All contentions are kept open. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21