[2025:RJ-JP:35934] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7016/2025 1. Manisha W/o Rajendra @ Raju, R/o Haripura, Police Station Rahuwas, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Women Jail, Jaipur). 2. Revdi W/o Dalu, R/o Haripura, Police Station Rahuwas, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Women Jail, Jaipur). 3. Sita W/o Mohan, R/o Haripura, Police Station Rahuwas, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Women Jail, Jaipur). 4. Asha W/o Chhotu, R/o Haripura, Police Station Rahuwas, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Women Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG Mr. Rajneesh Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.39/2025 registered at Police Station Rahuwas, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 190 and 103(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable [2025:RJ-JP:35934] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7016/2025] under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 191(2) and 191(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties and in cross-case, charge-sheet has already been filed against the complainant. It is submitted that omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioners. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioners are female and they are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, so also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the fact that petitioners are female, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed [2025:RJ-JP:35934] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7016/2025] that accused-petitioners – 1) Manisha W/o Rajendra @ Raju, 2) Revdi W/o Dalu, 3) Sita W/o Mohan and 4) Asha W/o Chhotu, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /66